Free

Free Will and Divine Foreknowledge EssayFree impart is the ability to make our declare choices in issues regarding all aspects of life. It is a power that enables us to make our ingest choices that are not affected by external factors such as divine bequeath. Therefore, each unrivaled sins by his/her own provideing. While, divine foreknowledge is the fact that deity has complete knowledge of what will see in the rising. In On Free Choice of the Will, St. Augustine discusses a critical issue which is the horror of homosexuals free will and beau ideals foreknowledge. So the question is, do we real have free will in spite of the fact that graven image foreknows everything?If God knows what must inevitably happen next, and so how do have the free will to make our own choices? Augustine comes up with a series of occupations to prove that we sin by our own will with no intervention of the divine foreknowledge. Augustine jump argued a characteristic of God that He ha s free will, and that He has foreknowledge of his own actions. Therefore, both Gods will and foreknowledge go along with each other. From this accuse he then assumes that mans will and Gods foreknowledge are both compatible. But can we comparing God with man? And is this argument convince enough?More elaboration has to be given in order to make it more convincing. Augustine then upshot to do so. He states that people who do not believe in the compatibility of free will and divine foreknowledge are those who are more dying(predicate) to excuse than confess their sins (p. 73). That thinks that people who always blame others for their own wrong doings quite a than admitting it are those who claim that we have no free will and that everything is already known by God, and that postcode can be changed, which they also use as a justification for their wrong actions.These people cash in ones chips their life by chance, leaving everything according to the circumstances rather than t rying to take good actions. An ensample for that is the beggars, who always try to take money from people without giving anything in return or until now having a job, although they have the ability to do so. But be vitrine of their laziness and their belief that this is what they were created to be, they leave everything to happen by luck and according to Gods foreknowledge that couldnt be changed (p. 73). Augustine then moves to another point which is the relation between the will and the power to achieve that will.He states that the will itself is within our power. Therefore, our desire to get off certain acts is a power that we own. But if we will something that is not within our power then it is not considered as a will because we can only will what is within our power. Augustine then discusses that if something good happens to us then it is accordance to our will, not against it. So for example, being happy, although God foreknows that you will be so, doesnt mean that we are happy against our will. Thus, Gods foreknowledge of our happiness doesnt take away our will to be happy (p.76). And so, he concludes that if God foreknows our will, then definitely this will is going to occur, and so it will be a will in the future. Consequently, his foreknowledge doesnt take away our will. And since that what we will is in our power, God foreknows our power and He will not take it away. Hence, we will have that power because God foreknows it (p. 77). So Augustine make it clear that it is necessary that whatever God has foreknown will happen, and that he foreknows our sins in such a way that our wills remain free and are with in our power (p.77).However, the fact that Gods foreknowledge of our sins is consistent with our free will in sinning still stays questionable. Taking into consideration the fact that God is just, so how does He punish our sins that happen by necessity? Or is Gods foreknowledge not an obligation? The topic is still confusing so Augustine then proceeds to make it clearer. He explains that if we are certain that someone is going to sin, then we have foreknowledge with the error that he/she is going to commit.This foreknowledge didnt force them to do so, but it was done by their own free will. Accordingly, their will to sin is consistent with our foreknowledge of that sin. Therefore, God forces no one to sin, even though he foresees those who are going to sin by their own will (p. 78). Augustine then compares foreknowledge with memory. He states that our memory does not force the past to have happened, and similarly Gods foreknowledge of the future doesnt force it to occur (p. 78).And we remember things in the past that we have done but didnt do everything that we remember, likewise God foreknows everything that He will cause in the future, but doesnt cause everything that is within His foreknowledge (p. 78). As a result, God punishes our sins that we do by our own will and which He did not cause, as God is known by his j ustice. Augustine then comes up with a good argument for all those who are still slightly confused, that if God should not punish us for our sins that He foresees then He also shouldnt reward us for our good work that He also foresees (p. 78).To conclude, Augustine succeeded in coming up with a good argument showing that mans free will and Gods foreknowledge are both compatible. The sequence of his ideas made his argument understandable and convincing for any reader. As a reader, Ive always thought about that subject but didnt receive any answers. However, reading On Free Choice of the Will made everything clear for me and made me well convinced that Gods foreknowledge doesnt intervene with our own choices that we make. Works Cited Williams, Thomas. On Free Choice of the Will. Indianapolis Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. , 1993. 129. Print.